2006 Land Rover LR3 vs. 2010 Audi A5
To start off, 2010 Audi A5 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Land Rover LR3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Land Rover LR3 would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Land Rover LR3 (216 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2010 Audi A5. (211 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 2010 Audi A5.
Because 2006 Land Rover LR3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Audi A5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover LR3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Land Rover LR3 (365 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Audi A5. (349 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2006 Land Rover LR3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Audi A5.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Land Rover LR3 | 2010 Audi A5 | |
Make | Land Rover | Audi |
Model | LR3 | A5 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 211 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque | 365 Nm | 349 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4625 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1382 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2751 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 65 L |