2006 Land Rover LR3 vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Land Rover LR3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Land Rover LR3 would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Land Rover LR3 (216 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 2010 Renault Clio. (81 HP @ 3750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Clio.
Because 2006 Land Rover LR3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover LR3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Land Rover LR3 (365 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Clio. (200 Nm @ 1900 RPM). This means 2006 Land Rover LR3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Land Rover LR3 | 2010 Renault Clio | |
Make | Land Rover | Renault |
Model | LR3 | Clio |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 1460 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Torque | 365 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 4.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 55 L |