2006 Land Rover LR3 vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Land Rover LR3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Land Rover LR3 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Land Rover LR3 weights approximately 1121 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Because 2006 Land Rover LR3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Mini Countryman. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover LR3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Land Rover LR3 (427 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 272 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2006 Land Rover LR3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Land Rover LR3 | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Land Rover | Mini |
Model | LR3 | Countryman |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 427 Nm | 155 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2461 kg | 1340 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4097 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1993 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.2 L/100km | 5.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 17 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 47 L |