2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport vs. 1968 Seat 1500
To start off, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 4,197 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport (385 HP) has 314 more horse power than 1968 Seat 1500. (71 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport should accelerate faster than 1968 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport weights approximately 240 kg more than 1968 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Seat 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | 1968 Seat 1500 | |
| Make | Land Rover | Seat |
| Model | Range Rover Sport | 1500 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4197 cc | 1481 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 385 HP | 71 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2660 mm |
