2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport vs. 1982 Mazda 121
To start off, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 121. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 121 would be higher. At 4,197 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport weights approximately 290 kg more than 1982 Mazda 121.
Because 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Mazda 121. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | 1982 Mazda 121 | |
Make | Land Rover | Mazda |
Model | Range Rover Sport | 121 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4197 cc | 1968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 385 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2520 mm |