2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport vs. 1984 Lotus Etna
To start off, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Lotus Etna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Lotus Etna would be higher. At 4,197 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport (385 HP) has 54 more horse power than 1984 Lotus Etna. (331 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport should accelerate faster than 1984 Lotus Etna.
Because 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Lotus Etna. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport (550 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Lotus Etna. (408 Nm). This means 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Lotus Etna.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | 1984 Lotus Etna | |
Make | Land Rover | Lotus |
Model | Range Rover Sport | Etna |
Year Released | 2006 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4197 cc | 3946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 385 HP | 331 HP |
Torque | 550 Nm | 408 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2520 mm |