2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport vs. 2000 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Renault Clio would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport weights approximately 465 kg more than 2000 Renault Clio.
Because 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | 2000 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Land Rover | Renault |
| Model | Range Rover Sport | Clio |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Horse Power | 385 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 935 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.2 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 18.2 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.8 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 50 L |
