2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport vs. 2008 Nissan Livina
To start off, 2008 Nissan Livina is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport would be higher. At 4,197 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Livina weights approximately 1005 kg more than 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport.
Because 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Nissan Livina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport (550 Nm) has 397 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan Livina. (153 Nm). This means 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan Livina.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | 2008 Nissan Livina | |
Make | Land Rover | Nissan |
Model | Range Rover Sport | Livina |
Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4197 cc | 1598 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 385 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 550 Nm | 153 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 2405 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.8 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 52 L |