2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport vs. 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet
To start off, 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport (300 HP) has 201 more horse power than 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet. (99 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport should accelerate faster than 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet.
Because 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet | |
| Make | Land Rover | Aston Martin |
| Model | Range Rover Sport | Cygnet |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2011 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4392 cc | 1300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 99 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 4 L/100km |
