2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport vs. 2011 Audi R8
To start off, 2011 Audi R8 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi R8 (420 HP) has 120 more horse power than 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport. (300 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Audi R8 (430 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport. (427 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2011 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | 2011 Audi R8 | |
Make | Land Rover | Audi |
Model | Range Rover Sport | R8 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4392 cc | 4200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 420 HP |
Torque | 427 Nm | 430 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4435 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1245 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2649 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 21.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 90 L |