2006 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1959 Renault Juva
To start off, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Renault Juva would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 620 kg more than 1959 Renault Juva.
Because 2006 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Renault Juva. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 1959 Renault Juva has manual transmission. 1959 Renault Juva will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Land Rover Range Rover | 1959 Renault Juva | |
| Make | Land Rover | Renault |
| Model | Range Rover | Juva |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1959 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Size | 4392 cc | 845 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 780 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 3610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2360 mm |
