2006 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 700 kg more than 2006 Land Rover Range Rover.
Because 2006 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Land Rover Range Rover | 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Land Rover | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Range Rover | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4392 cc | 6230 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 2100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3040 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 104 L | 109 L |
