2006 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1979 Audi Fox
To start off, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Audi Fox. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Audi Fox would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 490 kg more than 1979 Audi Fox.
Because 2006 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Audi Fox. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 1979 Audi Fox has manual transmission. 1979 Audi Fox will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Land Rover Range Rover | 1979 Audi Fox | |
| Make | Land Rover | Audi |
| Model | Range Rover | Fox |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4392 cc | 1271 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2550 mm |
