2006 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover (305 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 252 more horse power than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. (53 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 530 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover (441 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 351 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. (90 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Land Rover Range Rover | 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Land Rover | Mitsubishi |
Model | Range Rover | Lancer |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4392 cc | 1244 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 441 Nm | 90 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2390 mm |