2006 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1982 Opel Ascona
To start off, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover (305 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 215 more horse power than 1982 Opel Ascona. (90 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1982 Opel Ascona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 368 kg more than 1982 Opel Ascona. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Opel Ascona. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover (441 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 315 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Opel Ascona. (126 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2006 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Opel Ascona.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Land Rover Range Rover | 1982 Opel Ascona | |
Make | Land Rover | Opel |
Model | Range Rover | Ascona |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4392 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 441 Nm | 126 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 9.2:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1032 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 104 L | 70 L |