2006 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1997 Mercury MC4
To start off, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mercury MC4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mercury MC4 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Mercury MC4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover (305 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1997 Mercury MC4. (202 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1997 Mercury MC4.
Because 2006 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Mercury MC4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover (441 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Mercury MC4. (387 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Mercury MC4.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Land Rover Range Rover | 1997 Mercury MC4 | |
Make | Land Rover | Mercury |
Model | Range Rover | MC4 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4392 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 441 Nm | 387 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |