2006 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2010 Toyota Aygo
To start off, 2010 Toyota Aygo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover (305 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 238 more horse power than 2010 Toyota Aygo. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2010 Toyota Aygo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 536 kg more than 2010 Toyota Aygo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Toyota Aygo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover (441 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 348 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Toyota Aygo. (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Toyota Aygo. 2006 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 2010 Toyota Aygo has manual transmission. 2010 Toyota Aygo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Land Rover Range Rover | 2010 Toyota Aygo | |
Make | Land Rover | Toyota |
Model | Range Rover | Aygo |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4392 cc | 998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 441 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 71 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 864 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 3405 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1615 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2340 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 4.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 4.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 104 L | 35 L |