2006 Lexus GS vs. 2004 Rover 75
To start off, 2006 Lexus GS is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Rover 75 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Rover 75 (256 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2006 Lexus GS. (217 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 2006 Lexus GS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Rover 75 (410 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Lexus GS. (294 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2004 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Lexus GS.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Lexus GS | 2004 Rover 75 | |
Make | Lexus | Rover |
Model | GS | 75 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2997 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 294 Nm | 410 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 90.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 90 mm |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 8.2 seconds | 7.4 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.6 L/100km | 13.4 L/100km |