2006 Lexus IS vs. 2013 Mazda 2
To start off, 2013 Mazda 2 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Lexus IS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Lexus IS would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Lexus IS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Lexus IS (306 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 2013 Mazda 2. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Lexus IS should accelerate faster than 2013 Mazda 2.
Because 2006 Lexus IS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Lexus IS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Lexus IS (376 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mazda 2. (133 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Lexus IS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Lexus IS | 2013 Mazda 2 | |
| Make | Lexus | Mazda |
| Model | IS | 2 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3441 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 306 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 376 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1694 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1476 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2489 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.6 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 11.4 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 43 L |
