2006 Lexus IS vs. 2013 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC90 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Lexus IS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Lexus IS would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Lexus IS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Lexus IS (306 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2013 Volvo XC90. (237 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Lexus IS should accelerate faster than 2013 Volvo XC90.
Because 2006 Lexus IS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Lexus IS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC90, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Lexus IS (376 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Volvo XC90. (320 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Lexus IS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Volvo XC90.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Lexus IS | 2013 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Lexus | Volvo |
| Model | IS | XC90 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3441 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 6 valves |
| Horse Power | 306 HP | 237 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 376 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4807 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1936 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1784 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2857 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 8.6 L/100km | 8.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 11.4 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
