2006 Lexus LS vs. 1991 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Lexus LS is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Renault Clio would be higher. At 4,294 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Lexus LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Lexus LS (278 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 1991 Renault Clio. (107 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Lexus LS should accelerate faster than 1991 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Lexus LS weights approximately 740 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Lexus LS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Lexus LS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Lexus LS (423 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 268 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Renault Clio. (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2006 Lexus LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Renault Clio. 2006 Lexus LS has automatic transmission and 1991 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 1991 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Lexus LS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Lexus LS | 1991 Renault Clio | |
Make | Lexus | Renault |
Model | LS | Clio |
Year Released | 2006 | 1991 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 278 HP | 107 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 423 Nm | 155 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 91.1 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.5 mm | 83.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.8:1 |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.3 seconds | 9.2 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1765 kg | 1025 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 3720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.4 L/100km | 7.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 10.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 84 L | 43 L |