2006 Lexus RX vs. 1952 Triumph Renown
To start off, 2006 Lexus RX is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 3,308 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Lexus RX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Lexus RX (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1952 Triumph Renown. (66 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Lexus RX should accelerate faster than 1952 Triumph Renown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Lexus RX weights approximately 267 kg more than 1952 Triumph Renown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Lexus RX (323 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Triumph Renown. (147 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Lexus RX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Triumph Renown.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Lexus RX | 1952 Triumph Renown | |
| Make | Lexus | Triumph |
| Model | RX | Renown |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3308 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 223 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 323 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1547 kg | 1280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2750 mm |
