2006 Lexus RX vs. 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud
To start off, 2006 Lexus RX is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 553 kg more than 2006 Lexus RX.
Because 2006 Lexus RX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Lexus RX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Lexus RX | 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | |
| Make | Lexus | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | RX | Silver Cloud |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3308 cc | 6230 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 223 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 8.9:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1547 kg | 2100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 5380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 3130 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 15.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 73 L | 81 L |
