2006 Lexus RX vs. 2006 Daewoo Tocsa
To start off, both 2006 Lexus RX and 2006 Daewoo Tocsa were released in the same year (2006). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 3,310 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Lexus RX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Lexus RX (268 HP) has 115 more horse power than 2006 Daewoo Tocsa. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Lexus RX should accelerate faster than 2006 Daewoo Tocsa.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Lexus RX (288 Nm) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Daewoo Tocsa. (237 Nm). This means 2006 Lexus RX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Daewoo Tocsa. 2006 Lexus RX has automatic transmission and 2006 Daewoo Tocsa has manual transmission. 2006 Daewoo Tocsa will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Lexus RX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Lexus RX | 2006 Daewoo Tocsa | |
Make | Lexus | Daewoo |
Model | RX | Tocsa |
Year Released | 2006 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3310 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 288 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.8 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |