2006 Lexus RX vs. 2008 Volvo C70
To start off, 2008 Volvo C70 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Lexus RX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Lexus RX would be higher. At 3,310 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Lexus RX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Lexus RX (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2008 Volvo C70. (197 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Lexus RX should accelerate faster than 2008 Volvo C70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volvo C70 weights approximately 117 kg more than 2006 Lexus RX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Lexus RX (323 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Volvo C70. (270 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2006 Lexus RX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Lexus RX | 2008 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Lexus | Volvo |
Model | RX | C70 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3310 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 323 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1657 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 73 L | 68 L |