2006 Lexus RX vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Lexus RX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Lexus RX would be higher. At 3,310 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Lexus RX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 17 more horse power than 2006 Lexus RX. (223 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2006 Lexus RX.
Because 2012 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Lexus RX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Lexus RX (323 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2006 Lexus RX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Lexus RX | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Lexus | Holden |
Model | RX | Commodore |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3310 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 323 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |