2006 Lexus RX vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Lexus RX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Lexus RX would be higher.
Because 2006 Lexus RX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Smart Fortwo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Lexus RX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Lexus RX (323 Nm) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (130 Nm). This means 2006 Lexus RX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Lexus RX | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | Lexus | Smart |
| Model | RX | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Type | V | electric |
| Horse Power | 223 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 323 Nm | 130 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 1867 mm |
