2006 Lexus RX vs. 2013 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC60 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Lexus RX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Lexus RX would be higher. At 3,310 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Lexus RX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo XC60 (321 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 2006 Lexus RX. (268 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 2006 Lexus RX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 153 kg more than 2006 Lexus RX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo XC60 (480 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Lexus RX. (287 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2013 Volvo XC60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Lexus RX.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Lexus RX | 2013 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Lexus | Volvo |
Model | RX | XC60 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3310 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 321 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 287 Nm | 480 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1765 kg | 1918 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4627 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1891 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1713 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2774 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.7 L/100km | 8.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 7.6 L/100km | 12.1 L/100km |