2006 Lincoln LS vs. 1962 Volkswagen 1500
To start off, 2006 Lincoln LS is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volkswagen 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volkswagen 1500 would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Lincoln LS (239 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 187 more horse power than 1962 Volkswagen 1500. (52 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1962 Volkswagen 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Lincoln LS weights approximately 781 kg more than 1962 Volkswagen 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Lincoln LS | 1962 Volkswagen 1500 | |
Make | Lincoln | Volkswagen |
Model | LS | 1500 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1962 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4604 cc | 1491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 239 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1711 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2430 mm |