2006 Lincoln LS vs. 1965 Zastava 1500
To start off, 2006 Lincoln LS is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 3,933 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Lincoln LS (280 HP) has 227 more horse power than 1965 Zastava 1500. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1965 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Lincoln LS weights approximately 731 kg more than 1965 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Lincoln LS (388 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 295 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Zastava 1500. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Zastava 1500.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Lincoln LS | 1965 Zastava 1500 | |
Make | Lincoln | Zastava |
Model | LS | 1500 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 3933 cc | 1294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 280 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 388 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1711 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2430 mm |