2006 Lincoln LS vs. 2011 Volvo C30
To start off, 2011 Volvo C30 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Lincoln LS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Lincoln LS would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Lincoln LS weights approximately 260 kg more than 2011 Volvo C30.
Because 2006 Lincoln LS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Lincoln LS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Lincoln LS (388 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Volvo C30. (350 Nm). This means 2006 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Volvo C30.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Lincoln LS | 2011 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Lincoln | Volvo |
Model | LS | C30 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 280 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 388 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1711 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 60 L |