2006 Lincoln Mark LT vs. 1963 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT (300 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1963 Lincoln Continental. (284 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT should accelerate faster than 1963 Lincoln Continental. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Lincoln Mark LT weights approximately 36 kg more than 1963 Lincoln Continental. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Lincoln Mark LT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lincoln Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Lincoln Mark LT | 1963 Lincoln Continental | |
| Make | Lincoln | Lincoln |
| Model | Mark LT | Continental |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5406 cc | 7048 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 284 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2436 kg | 2400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 5500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2000 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3520 mm | 3210 mm |
