2006 Lincoln Mark LT vs. 1973 Mazda 929
To start off, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 5,406 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Lincoln Mark LT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT (300 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 1973 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT should accelerate faster than 1973 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Lincoln Mark LT weights approximately 1276 kg more than 1973 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Lincoln Mark LT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1973 Mazda 929. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT (495 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 358 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda 929. (137 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Lincoln Mark LT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Lincoln Mark LT | 1973 Mazda 929 | |
| Make | Lincoln | Mazda |
| Model | Mark LT | 929 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5406 cc | 1768 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 495 Nm | 137 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 90.2 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 105.9 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 8.6:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2436 kg | 1160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3520 mm | 2520 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 114 L | 65 L |
