2006 Lincoln Mark LT vs. 1981 Simca 2 Litres
To start off, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Simca 2 Litres. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Simca 2 Litres would be higher. At 5,406 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Lincoln Mark LT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Lincoln Mark LT weights approximately 1311 kg more than 1981 Simca 2 Litres.
Because 2006 Lincoln Mark LT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Simca 2 Litres. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Lincoln Mark LT has automatic transmission and 1981 Simca 2 Litres has manual transmission. 1981 Simca 2 Litres will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Lincoln Mark LT will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Lincoln Mark LT | 1981 Simca 2 Litres | |
| Make | Lincoln | Simca |
| Model | Mark LT | 2 Litres |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5406 cc | 1981 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2436 kg | 1125 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3520 mm | 2670 mm |
