2006 Lincoln Mark LT vs. 2000 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 5,406 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Lincoln Mark LT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Lincoln Mark LT weights approximately 1266 kg more than 2000 Nissan Bluebird.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Lincoln Mark LT has automatic transmission and 2000 Nissan Bluebird has manual transmission. 2000 Nissan Bluebird will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Lincoln Mark LT will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Lincoln Mark LT | 2000 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Lincoln | Nissan |
| Model | Mark LT | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5406 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 2436 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1450 mm |
