2006 Lincoln Mark LT vs. 2001 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Renault Kangoo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Renault Kangoo would be higher. At 5,406 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Lincoln Mark LT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT (300 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 242 more horse power than 2001 Renault Kangoo. (58 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT should accelerate faster than 2001 Renault Kangoo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Lincoln Mark LT weights approximately 1396 kg more than 2001 Renault Kangoo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Lincoln Mark LT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Renault Kangoo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT (495 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 402 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Renault Kangoo. (93 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Lincoln Mark LT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Renault Kangoo. 2006 Lincoln Mark LT has automatic transmission and 2001 Renault Kangoo has manual transmission. 2001 Renault Kangoo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Lincoln Mark LT will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Lincoln Mark LT | 2001 Renault Kangoo | |
| Make | Lincoln | Renault |
| Model | Mark LT | Kangoo |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2001 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Panel Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5406 cc | 1149 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 58 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 495 Nm | 93 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 90.2 mm | 69 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 105.9 mm | 76.8 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2436 kg | 1040 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3520 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 114 L | 38 L |
