2006 Lincoln Mark LT vs. 2005 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 5,406 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Lincoln Mark LT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Lincoln Mark LT weights approximately 716 kg more than 2005 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Lincoln Mark LT | 2005 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Lincoln | Ford |
Model | Mark LT | Ranger |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5406 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2436 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3520 mm | 3010 mm |