2006 Lincoln Mark LT vs. 2009 Renault Twingo
To start off, 2009 Renault Twingo is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Lincoln Mark LT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Lincoln Mark LT would be higher. At 5,406 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Lincoln Mark LT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT (300 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 237 more horse power than 2009 Renault Twingo. (63 HP @ 3750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Twingo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Lincoln Mark LT weights approximately 1381 kg more than 2009 Renault Twingo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Lincoln Mark LT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Renault Twingo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT (495 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 335 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Twingo. (160 Nm @ 1900 RPM). This means 2006 Lincoln Mark LT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Twingo. 2006 Lincoln Mark LT has automatic transmission and 2009 Renault Twingo has manual transmission. 2009 Renault Twingo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Lincoln Mark LT will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Lincoln Mark LT | 2009 Renault Twingo | |
| Make | Lincoln | Renault |
| Model | Mark LT | Twingo |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5406 cc | 1459 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 63 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Torque | 495 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1900 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 90.2 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 105.9 mm | 80.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 17.9:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2436 kg | 1055 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 3610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3520 mm | 2370 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 4.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 114 L | 40 L |
