2006 Lincoln Mark LT vs. 2013 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2013 Nissan Rogue is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Lincoln Mark LT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Lincoln Mark LT would be higher. At 5,406 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Lincoln Mark LT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT (300 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 2013 Nissan Rogue. (168 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT should accelerate faster than 2013 Nissan Rogue. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Lincoln Mark LT weights approximately 947 kg more than 2013 Nissan Rogue. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Lincoln Mark LT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Nissan Rogue. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT (495 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Nissan Rogue. (237 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2006 Lincoln Mark LT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Nissan Rogue.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Lincoln Mark LT | 2013 Nissan Rogue | |
Make | Lincoln | Nissan |
Model | Mark LT | Rogue |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5406 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 495 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90.2 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 105.9 mm | 100 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2436 kg | 1489 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4655 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3520 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 114 L | 60 L |