2006 Lincoln Navigator vs. 1956 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2006 Lincoln Navigator is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher.
Because 2006 Lincoln Navigator is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Lincoln Navigator will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Lincoln Navigator | 1956 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Lincoln | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Navigator | Phantom |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1956 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3020 mm | 3690 mm |
