2006 Lincoln Navigator vs. 2010 Holden Calais
To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Lincoln Navigator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Lincoln Navigator would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Lincoln Navigator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Lincoln Navigator (300 HP) has 22 more horse power than 2010 Holden Calais. (278 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Lincoln Navigator should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Calais.
Because 2006 Lincoln Navigator is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden Calais. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Lincoln Navigator will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Lincoln Navigator (495 Nm) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Calais. (350 Nm). This means 2006 Lincoln Navigator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Calais.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Lincoln Navigator | 2010 Holden Calais | |
| Make | Lincoln | Holden |
| Model | Navigator | Calais |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5408 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 278 HP |
| Torque | 495 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
