2006 Lincoln Navigator vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Lincoln Navigator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Lincoln Navigator would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Lincoln Navigator weights approximately 1464 kg more than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Because 2006 Lincoln Navigator is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Mini Roadster. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Lincoln Navigator will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Lincoln Navigator (495 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Roadster. (279 Nm @ 5100 RPM). This means 2006 Lincoln Navigator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Lincoln Navigator | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
Make | Lincoln | Mini |
Model | Navigator | Roadster |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 495 Nm | 279 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2719 kg | 1255 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 3758 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1391 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3020 mm | 2467 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 14.7 L/100km | 6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 50 L |