2006 Lincoln Zephyr vs. 1967 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2006 Lincoln Zephyr is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Lincoln Zephyr is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Lincoln Zephyr (218 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Lincoln Zephyr should accelerate faster than 1967 Riley Kestrel.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Lincoln Zephyr (271 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Lincoln Zephyr will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Lincoln Zephyr | 1967 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Lincoln | Riley |
Model | Zephyr | Kestrel |
Year Released | 2006 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 218 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4750 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Height | 990 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 25 L |