2006 Lincoln Zephyr vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2006 Lincoln Zephyr is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Lincoln Zephyr is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Lincoln Zephyr (218 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (159 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Lincoln Zephyr should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6.
Because 2003 Mazda 6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Lincoln Zephyr. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Lincoln Zephyr (271 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (205 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Lincoln Zephyr will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Lincoln Zephyr | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Lincoln | Mazda |
Model | Zephyr | 6 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 218 HP | 159 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 205 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.6:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Height | 990 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.4 L/100km | 8.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 10.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 62 L |