2006 Lincoln Zephyr vs. 2003 MG ZS
To start off, 2006 Lincoln Zephyr is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MG ZS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MG ZS would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Lincoln Zephyr is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Lincoln Zephyr (218 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2003 MG ZS. (175 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Lincoln Zephyr should accelerate faster than 2003 MG ZS.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Lincoln Zephyr (271 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MG ZS. (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Lincoln Zephyr will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MG ZS. 2006 Lincoln Zephyr has automatic transmission and 2003 MG ZS has manual transmission. 2003 MG ZS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Lincoln Zephyr will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Lincoln Zephyr | 2003 MG ZS | |
Make | Lincoln | MG |
Model | Zephyr | ZS |
Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 218 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Height | 990 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 9.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 55 L |