2006 Maserati MC12 vs. 2011 Daewoo Tocsa
To start off, 2011 Daewoo Tocsa is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Maserati MC12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Maserati MC12 would be higher. At 5,998 cc (12 cylinders), 2006 Maserati MC12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Maserati MC12 (623 HP) has 470 more horse power than 2011 Daewoo Tocsa. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Maserati MC12 should accelerate faster than 2011 Daewoo Tocsa.
Because 2006 Maserati MC12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Maserati MC12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Daewoo Tocsa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Maserati MC12 (652 Nm) has 415 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Daewoo Tocsa. (237 Nm). This means 2006 Maserati MC12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Daewoo Tocsa.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Maserati MC12 | 2011 Daewoo Tocsa | |
Make | Maserati | Daewoo |
Model | MC12 | Tocsa |
Year Released | 2006 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5998 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 623 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 652 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2100 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 18.2 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |