2006 Maserati Quattroporte vs. 1946 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 2006 Maserati Quattroporte is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 4,243 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Maserati Quattroporte is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Maserati Quattroporte (395 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 310 more horse power than 1946 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Maserati Quattroporte should accelerate faster than 1946 Volvo PV 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Volvo PV 60 weights approximately 90 kg more than 2006 Maserati Quattroporte.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Maserati Quattroporte | 1946 Volvo PV 60 | |
| Make | Maserati | Volvo |
| Model | Quattroporte | PV 60 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1946 |
| Engine Size | 4243 cc | 3670 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 395 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7250 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1630 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 2850 mm |
