2006 Maserati Quattroporte vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2006 Maserati Quattroporte is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 4,245 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Maserati Quattroporte is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Maserati Quattroporte (395 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 342 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Maserati Quattroporte should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102.
Because 2006 Maserati Quattroporte is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Maserati Quattroporte. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Maserati Quattroporte (442 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 364 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (78 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Maserati Quattroporte will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Maserati Quattroporte | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Maserati | Zastava |
Model | Quattroporte | 102 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 4245 cc | 1115 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 395 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 7250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 442 Nm | 78 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 2160 mm |