2006 Mazda 2 vs. 1953 Steyr 2000
To start off, 2006 Mazda 2 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Steyr 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Steyr 2000 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Steyr 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 2 (67 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1953 Steyr 2000. (64 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1953 Steyr 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Steyr 2000 weights approximately 40 kg more than 2006 Mazda 2.
Because 1953 Steyr 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Steyr 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 2 | 1953 Steyr 2000 | |
Make | Mazda | Steyr |
Model | 2 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1953 |
Engine Size | 1399 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2660 mm |