2006 Mazda 2 vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 2006 Mazda 2 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 1,388 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda 2 weights approximately 550 kg more than 1965 Seat 600.
Because 1965 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 2 (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda 2 | 1965 Seat 600 | |
| Make | Mazda | Seat |
| Model | 2 | 600 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1388 cc | 767 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 124 Nm | 47 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2010 mm |
